My challenge to Atheists is that they give me a reason that is consistent with their own view of reality that I should use logic and reason to convince them of theism instead of using a gun.
sk, so how is the fact that you also owning a gun make my using a gun to convince you inconsistent with your view of reality? (I'm assuming that you are an atheist)
vytautas, where do you get your concept of lawfulness? would if we lived in a time where lawful or unlawful had no meaning and would if I lived in a country where it was lawful?
4 Comments:
Because I own a gun too? So let's assume a state of mutual stand-off regarding the gun.
You should not use a gun to convince someone because that is unlawful.
sk, so how is the fact that you also owning a gun make my using a gun to convince you inconsistent with your view of reality? (I'm assuming that you are an atheist)
vytautas, where do you get your concept of lawfulness? would if we lived in a time where lawful or unlawful had no meaning and would if I lived in a country where it was lawful?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home